Research Open Access | Volume 9 (3): Article  139 | Published: 24 Aug 2026

High mpox mortality in people living with HIV and immune suppression: Lessons from Sierra Leone for integrated outbreak preparedness and response

   Menu, Tables and Figures

Keywords

  • Mpox
  • HIV
  • Immune suppression
  • Vaccination
  • Health information systems

Rosamund Felicity Lewis1,&, Chikwe Andreas Ihekweazu1

1Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

&Corresponding author: Rosamund Felicity Lewis,  Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Email: lewisr@who.int ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7227-2545

Received: 18 Jul 2026, Accepted: 18 Aug 2026, Published: 24 Aug 2026

Domain: Infectious Disease Epidemiology

Keywords: Mpox, HIV, immune suppression, vaccination, health information systems

©Rosamund Felicity Lewis et al. Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health (ISSN: 2664-2824). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Cite this article: Rosamund Felicity Lewis et al., High mpox mortality in people living with HIV and immune suppression: Lessons from Sierra Leone for integrated outbreak preparedness and response. Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health. 2026; 9(3):139. https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-26-00257

This is a commentary on: Ikoona EN et al. Fourfold or higher mpox mortality in people living with HIV: A national cohort from Sierra Leone’s 2025 outbreak. J Interv Epidemiol Public Health. 2026;9(2):100. https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-26-00070

Abstract

The 2025 mpox outbreak in Sierra Leone provides compelling evidence that people living with advanced HIV infection remain at greatly increased risk of death from mpox. The national cohort study by Ikoona et al demonstrates the value of integrated health information systems, linking 90% of confirmed mpox cases with their HIV status, largely using a national unique health identifier. The study illustrates how health service data can be used during an outbreak to identify vulnerable populations and guide interventions. In addition to broader public health interventions, these findings reinforce the need for integrated HIV/STI and mpox prevention and care services, pre-exposure vaccination for people at risk, sustained investment in surveillance and data systems, and sustained emergency preparedness, including pre-approved research protocols. The long-term goal should extend beyond emergency response towards the elimination of mpox as a public health problem.

Commentary

The epidemiology of mpox has undergone profound transition since the global outbreak began in 2022, yet the epidemic is far from over. The largest recorded multi-country outbreaks have demonstrated the extraordinary capacity of mpox for international spread through sexual networks, disproportionately affecting key populations with elevated HIV prevalence and higher risk for severe disease [1-6]. Sustained transmission in Africa and cross-border outbreaks have highlighted the heterogeneity of the epidemic, with some settings experiencing broader community transmission where infants and children are also at risk [2,3,5,6]. Despite important progress in outbreak control, recurrent international spread underscores the need for a coordinated, longer-term approach to prevention and control.

Against this backdrop, the study by Ikoona and colleagues in the Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health is both timely and important, drawing attention to an overall case fatality of 1.1% in the 2025 Sierra Leone mpox epidemic linked to clade IIb monkeypox virus (MPXV) [7], well above the mortality associated with clade IIb in high income settings [1-6]. Drawing on national surveillance and programme data, the authors demonstrate that higher mpox mortality among people living with HIV was concentrated among those with severe immunosuppression (14-fold higher) and uncontrolled infection (20-fold higher) compared to those with no HIV infection or HIV with viral suppression and preserved immune function. The findings thus further document that HIV infection per se is not the main determinant of poor outcomes, as reported by others for clade IIb [1-3, 5,8] and which remains consistent across contexts and virus clades [2,3,6,8]. Rather, excess mortality in people living with HIV is associated with the consequences of advanced or untreated HIV disease, calling for prompt and effective management of HIV infection in people with mpox. Thus, HIV status remains one important marker of risk for mpox, either due to shared risk factors for exposure or due to higher risk for severe disease or death.

This study also revealed that almost two-thirds of the 60 deaths reported occurred in people without HIV; deaths among the 386 children or 37 pregnant women were not identified. Recent reports have summarized mpox case fatality ratios (CFR) by clade, with global mortality remaining below 1% for clade II, and improving over time for clade Ia (1.7–4%) and clade Ib (0.7%, and 4% in infants) where adequate care is available [2]. Mortality nevertheless remains higher in Africa than elsewhere, regardless of clade [2,3,6,7]. The 1.1% CFR for clade IIb in Sierra Leone was six times higher than the global clade IIb CFR reported over 2022 to 2023 (< 0.2%), although substantially lower than the 7.0% noted in Nigeria (26% in those living with HIV, including children) [5], and the 12 % reported in a smaller outbreak South Africa in 2024 [3], most of whom also had HIV. For comparison, fatality for confirmed clade Ia among hospitalised patients of all ages receiving close clinical monitoring and care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was 1.7% in historically affected areas, while fatality among suspected cases overall was 2.2%, with higher mortality in young children [2,6]. Conversely, a CFR of up to 0.3% (largely for clade Ib) was seen among mostly adults in newly affected areas [3].

Mortality related to clade Ib has also varied substantially among African countries, ranging in 2024 from no reported deaths in several to 1% in Uganda, 3.2% in Kenya, 3.3% in the Central African Republic (clades Ia and Ib). A CFR of 22% was reported in Cameroon (clades I and II) [3], and a 2026 clade Ib outbreak in Pakistan saw seven infant deaths in a month, linked to transmission in health facilities. Beyond these two settings, no death due to clade Ib has been reported among travel-associated or locally acquired cases [3]. Since January 2025, recorded all-clade CFR has been approximately 0.46% in the WHO African region, compared with 0.17% elsewhere (21 mpox deaths of 12 533 confirmed cases) [3]. Such variation highlights the difficulty of attributing causes of mpox deaths to context- or clade-related factors.

Interpretation of these differences is also constrained by major gaps in surveillance and case-based data in several regions [3]. In Africa, individual case-based data are available for only 1% of cases and, with the exception of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, reported data at global level only capture confirmed cases and deaths [3]. Differences in mortality therefore reflect a combination of case ascertainment, access to diagnosis and care, individual factors including age, comorbidities, modes of transmission and other epidemiological and contextual factors, in addition to any viral strain features. Strengthening surveillance, laboratory capacity, community awareness and tailored clinical care remains critical to improving patient outcomes in all settings. Ikoona and colleagues therefore provide welcome new data on one important determinant of mpox mortality: uncontrolled HIV infection and severe immunosuppression.

The importance of the study extends beyond its epidemiological findings, however. With a multi-pronged strategy, in addition to broader community-based vaccination, Sierra Leone vaccinated over two-thirds (71%) of anti-retroviral therapy clinic enrollees in seven of 16 districts within six weeks of beginning vaccination, reaching almost a fifth of the estimated number of persons living with HIV in the country through this integrated strategy. The study authors achieved linkage of HIV status for nearly 90% of the country’s 5,442 confirmed mpox cases, 73 % with a national unique health identifier and 17% through person-place-and-time matching. This represents a remarkable accomplishment, even belatedly in the course of a large outbreak, and showed that HIV prevalence was 8.7% in people with mpox. Too often, emergency responses generate parallel information systems that fail to communicate with one another. Instead, this report demonstrates how close coordination between emergency management structures, disease programmes and clinical health services, laboratories, and health information systems can produce actionable intelligence during an evolving epidemic.

The implications for research are substantial. First, the findings add to a growing body of evidence from African and other settings that HIV-associated immunosuppression is a major risk factor for severe mpox disease and death [5,8]. They reinforce the need to better understand the interaction between mpox, immune dysfunction, and access to antiretroviral therapy. Reducing mpox mortality among people living with HIV depends not only on the management of mpox itself but also on ensuring timely HIV diagnosis, access to effective antiretroviral treatment, viral suppression, and immune restoration [ 5,6,9]. With respect to the virulence of monkeypox virus clades, while laboratory studies demonstrate higher virulence of clade I over clade II, disentangling this effect from contextual factors and the populations affected in the real world is much more complex. In practice, outbreak setting, underlying conditions in affected individuals, and access to care may have a greater influence on mortality than viral virulence alone, as illustrated by the markedly higher mortality in a small sub-group of people in this and other studies. For greater public health impact, in addition to seeking to understand viral virulence as virus strains evolve, research should also identify and assess interventions to prevent outbreaks, reduce transmission and avert severe outcomes.

Second, the Sierra Leone experience illustrates the value of using routine health service data during outbreaks to identify people at risk and offer preventive interventions. The ability to link surveillance, laboratory, vaccination, and HIV programme data creates opportunities to answer critical operational questions: Which populations are at highest risk? How can services be tailored for them? How were children affected during this outbreak? Which interventions are most effective in preventing severe disease? What is the contribution of vaccination to reducing transmission and mortality? Generating answers to these questions during an outbreak is itself an important research and preparedness function, essential not only for the ongoing global epidemic but also for preparedness against future outbreaks.

The public health implications of this study are thus equally important. The findings underscore the importance of early action to tailor the response to the local context [9] and provide a strong argument for integrating health services for mpox, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Individuals presenting with suspected or confirmed mpox should be offered HIV testing, and when HIV infection is known or confirmed, rapid referral for assessment of immune status and viral suppression and for appropriate care [10]. Conversely, people receiving HIV or STI services should be assessed for their risk of mpox and offered prevention interventions, including vaccination with available third-generation mpox vaccines [11].  Although this study is retrospective, the offer of vaccination directly in antiretroviral therapy clinics and analysis of clinical outcomes in this setting illustrate how a good understanding of risk can support implementation of relevant interventions during an outbreak.

Integration should also extend beyond health care settings. The epidemiology of recent outbreaks indicates that many individuals at risk can be reached through sexual health clinics and antiretroviral treatment centres, but also through community venues and networks, such as bars, nightclubs or saunas, and at events attended by populations at risk. Prevention services can be brought to the places where people are most likely to benefit from them. Some countries have demonstrated innovative delivery models such as ‘pop-up‘ or ‘moonlight’ vaccination, which offer mpox vaccination through community outreach or at night to facilitate access and acceptance among populations at risk.

Vaccination remains a cornerstone of prevention. The Sierra Leone experience reinforces the importance of pre-exposure vaccination of people at risk before exposure occurs. Current data support the effectiveness of available and widely used mpox vaccines, MVA-BN and LC16m8, although important knowledge gaps remain, particularly for immunocompromised populations [11-14]. To facilitate rapid uptake of mpox vaccines for outbreak response, countries should initiate policy and regulatory preparedness based on current guidance [11, 14]. Going forward, individuals who received a single dose of a two-dose vaccine during the outbreak response should be offered the second dose at the earliest opportunity to complete the recommended immunization schedule. Whether additional doses or booster strategies are required for some people living with HIV remains uncertain and merits further investigation.

The study also responds directly to priorities identified in recent calls for a sustained global response to mpox [15]. It demonstrates the feasibility and value of integrated services; highlights the need to identify and protect populations experiencing disproportionate risk; and illustrates how strengthened surveillance and health information systems can support both emergency response and longer-term control efforts. However, these achievements require investment. The linkage of datasets described by the authors depended upon resources, planning, and collaboration that may not be available in every setting. Preparedness plans should therefore include provisions for interoperable information systems, unique patient identifiers where feasible, and mechanisms for rapid analytical capacity during emergencies.

Many questions remain unanswered. The causes of death among individuals without HIV, who represented two-thirds of mpox-linked deaths in this outbreak, require further study, and the experience of children and pregnant women with mpox should be documented. The contribution of vaccination to reduction of disease severity and interruption of transmission during the latter stages of the Sierra Leone outbreak warrants formal analysis. Continued surveillance and data collection are needed to monitor evolving patterns of risk, modes of transmission, and the changing epidemiology of mpox across different settings and virus clades. Further evaluation of vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of MVA-BN and LC16m8 vaccines, particularly in populations at higher risk, is needed, together with a better understanding of the contribution of indirect (herd) immunity to outbreak dynamics.

Perhaps the most important lesson from Sierra Leone is that mpox can no longer be approached solely as an episodic emergency. With 145 countries having confirmed mpox outbreaks in four years, each month still brings a new national report of a first case of mpox [3]. At the same time, viral genome sequencing continues to reveal circulation of monkeypox virus in animal species in parts of Africa where mpox has been emerging for decades, highlighting the potential for frequent spillover when humans interact with reservoir species [16]. Thus, the persistence of zoonotic and human-to-human transmission of mpox in Africa and continuing international spread demand a longer-term strategy to manage ongoing risk, protect vulnerable populations and eliminate mpox as a public health problem through a One Health approach. Such a strategy should mobilize national and local stakeholders according to the local context; integrate mpox, HIV and STI services and clinical care; strengthen surveillance and data systems; prioritize pre-exposure vaccination of populations at risk; ensure respectful engagement with affected communities and locally relevant risk communication; and embed research in the response to generate actionable new data during an outbreak. 

Conclusion

The work by Ikoona and colleagues is therefore more than a report of excess mortality among people with immune suppression. It demonstrates what becomes possible when health systems work together during an emergency. As fragmented health information systems increase reporting burden and delay generation of actionable data, this study from Sierra Leone demonstrates the value of linking surveillance and programme data across diseases. The Sierra Leone experience provides a valuable model for epidemic preparedness and response in Africa and globally. The broader lesson is clear: sustainable mpox control and elimination as a public health problem will depend on integrating preparedness with routine health systems and programmes that can identify, reach and protect those most at risk, while maintaining capacity for surveillance and response.

What is already known about the topic

  • Reported mpox mortality varies widely by setting and over time, reflecting differences in who is affected, access to timely diagnosis and clinical care, and surveillance and laboratory capacity as well as the virus clades involved.
  • People living with HIV are at risk of mpox and advanced HIV disease raises the risk of severe disease and death. The rapid emergence of virus clades Ib and IIb through sexual transmission highlights the need for integrated approaches to mpox outbreak response.
  • Surveillance, vaccination, and access to HIV care are important for mpox prevention and control. The Sierra Leone experience offers a practical example of how integrated services can facilitate access to care for people living with HIV.
  • Fragmented health information systems that cannot readily share data can impede outbreak response as disconnected datasets require substantial effort to link, analyse, and translate data into information to guide action.
  • Important knowledge gaps remain regarding the factors associated with severe disease and death from mpox and strategies to reduce mortality through earlier diagnosis, timely vaccination, optimized clinical management for all patients, and immune restoration in people with advanced HIV disease.

What this  commentary adds

  • This commentary places the Sierra Leone findings within the evolving global epidemiology of mpox, highlighting substantial variation in mortality between virus clades and settings and the contribution of differences in context to these outcomes.
  • It calls for better understanding of all causes of death to advance early recognition and care for medical complications of mpox.
  • For people living with HIV, the commentary identifies severe immunosuppression rather than HIV infection alone as a principal driver of excess mpox deaths, emphasizes that timely HIV diagnosis and rapid optimization of antiretroviral therapy are essential, and underscores the need for integrated HIV, STI and mpox prevention and care services.
  • It identifies pre-exposure vaccination of populations at risk and continued evaluation of vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection as priorities for research and policy.
  • It argues that health information systems that can link surveillance and programme data can help quickly reach people at risk with timely health interventions and facilitate research as a core component of epidemic preparedness.
  • The lessons from Sierra Leone support a transition from episodic emergency response to sustained strategies to eliminate mpox as a public health problem.

Competing interest

The authors of this work declare no competing interests.

Funding

The authors did not receive any specific funding for this work.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Rosamund Felicity Lewis
Writing – original draft: Rosamund Felicity Lewis
Writing -review and editing: Rosamund Felicity Lewis
Data curation: Rosamund Felicity Lewis
Supervision: Chikwe Andreas Ihekweazu
Validation: Chikwe Andreas Ihekweazu

 

References

  1. Laurenson-Schafer H, Sklenovská N, Hoxha A, Kerr SM, Ndumbi P, Fitzner J, Almiron M, De Sousa LA, Briand S, Cenciarelli O, Colombe S, Doherty M, Fall IS, García-Calavaro C, Haussig JM, Kato M, Mahamud AR, Morgan OW, Nabeth P, Naiene JD, Navegantes WA, Ogundiran O, Okot C, Pebody R, Matsui T, Ramírez HLG, Smallwood C, Tasigchana RFP, Vaughan AM, Williams GS, Abdelgawad B, Babu A, Buliva E, Campbell F, Cardoso Portela Câmara D, Eleiba Z, Greene-Cramer BJ, Hamblion E, Hassan M, Kaasik-Aaslav K, Mohamed B, Ndarukwa V, Otieno JR, Pires J, Pukkila J, Sanni F, Schultz C, Sedai T, Skrowny L, Phengxay M, Ochirpurev A, Skufca J, Goddard L, Biaukula V, Mala PO, Lewis RF, Pavlin BI, Le Polain De Waroux O. Description of the first global outbreak of mpox: an analysis of global surveillance data. Journal article. The Lancet Global Health [Internet]. 2023 Jul; cited 2026 Aug 24;11(7):e1012–23. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(23)00198-5/fulltext doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00198-5
  2. Ogoina D, Dunning J, Damon I, Mbala P, Kuppalli K. Mpox emergence, epidemiology, biology, clinical features and control. Journal article. Nat Rev Microbiol [Internet]. 2026 Apr 8; cited 2026 Aug 24;24(7):463–77. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-026-01305-y doi:10.1038/s41579-026-01305-y
  3. World Health Organization. Mpox global trends. Website. [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2026 Jul 31; cited 2026 Aug 24. Available from: https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/
  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Mpox worldwide overview. Website. [Internet]. Stockholm (Sweden): ECDC; 2026 Jun 26; cited 2026 Aug 24. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/mpox-worldwide-overview
  5. Ngbede JP, Ezenwa-Ahanene SA, Njiforti FR, Sabo RM, Sabah MS, Madaki PD. Epidemiological shifts and zoonotic drivers of mpox in Nigeria: A One Health systematic review and meta-analysis, 2017–2025. Journal article. J Interv Epidemiol Public Health [Internet]. 2026 May 22; cited 2026 Aug 24;9(2):83. Available from: https://afenet-journal.org/10-37432-jieph-d-26-00103/ doi:10.37432/jieph-d-26-00103
  6. Mfitundinda E, Migisha R, Kobusingye JO, Okello EO, Wenani D, Kobusinge JL, Kwizera P, Nalwanga J, Mutesi C, Katumba H, Namakula LO, Namusisi AM, Ainembabazi B, Abbo G, Eyu P, Lukabwe I, Kwesiga B, Bulage L, Komakech A, Atim D, Kavuma P, Kaliisa R, Park I, Wasike S, Kadobera D, Ario AR. Assessment of mpox severity and associated factors in Uganda, November 2024–February 2025. Journal article. Int J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2026 May 26; cited 2026 Aug 24;170:108832. Available from: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(26)00467-4/fulltext doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108832
  7. Ikoona EN, Namulemo L, Sinnah MM, Vandi MA, Sahr F. Fourfold or higher mpox mortality in people living with HIV: A national cohort from Sierra Leone’s 2025 outbreak. Journal article. J Interv Epidemiol Public Health [Internet]. 2026 Jun 17; cited 2026 Aug 24;9(2):100. Available from: https://afenet-journal.org/10-37432-jieph-d-26-00070/ doi:10.37432/jieph-d-26-00070
  8. Mitjà O, Alemany A, Marks M, Lezama Mora JI, Rodríguez-Aldama JC, Torres Silva MS, Corral Herrera EA, Crabtree-Ramirez B, Blanco JL, Girometti N, Mazzotta V, Hazra A, Silva M, Montenegro-Idrogo JJ, Gebo K, Ghosn J, Peña Vázquez MF, Matos Prado E, Unigwe U, Villar-García J, Wald-Dickler N, Zucker J, Paredes R, Calmy A, Waters L, Galvan-Casas C, Walmsley S, Orkin CM, Leiro V, Marchetta L, Fernandez Pardal P, Figueroa MI, Cahn P, Grabmeier-Pfistershammer K, Libois A, Liesenborghs L, Grinsztejn B, Schechter M, Dos Santos De Lemos A, Furtado Costa A, Queiroz Rocha S, Valdez Madruga J, Tan DH, Mishra S, Shah S, Jorquera C, Castillo A, Carrión M, Cevallos N, Palich R, Pourcher V, Rubenstein E, Migaud P, Boesecke C, Hoffmann C, Protopapas K, Nozza S, Cattelan AM, Mussini C, d’Arminio Monforte A, Cruz Flores RA, Pérez Barragán E, Rodríguez Guzmán AL, Ogoina D, Chika-Igwenyi NM, Chizaram O, Valverde López J, García Tello A, Ubals M, Vall M, Mendoza A, Suñer C, Clotet B, Bechini J, Lepe JA, Navarro-Amuedo MD, Bernadino JI, Català A, Tarín Vicente EJ, González Rodríguez B, Rodriguez-Mercader S, Sánchez-Martinez F, Cañas-Ruano E, Parra-Navarro L, Filén F, Tallón De Lara C, Braun D, Piezzi V, Burkhard M, Kovari H, Mönch A, Dunning J, Simoes P, Nori A, Keegan S, Thornhill JP, Apea V, Noori T, Jones JL, Judson S, Gilliams EA, Hamill MM, Keruly J, Henao Martínez AF, Lin A, So J, Davar K, Villareal D, Tapia Paredes M. Mpox in people with advanced HIV infection: a global case series. Journal article. The Lancet [Internet]. 2023 Mar 18; cited 2026 Aug 24;401(10380):939–49. Available from: doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00273-8
  9. World Health Organization (WHO). Strategic framework for enhancing prevention and control of mpox (2024–2027). PDF. [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2024 May 24; cited 2026 Aug 24. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240092907
  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Clinical management and infection prevention and control for mpox: living guideline. PDF. [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2025 Jun 2; cited 2026 Aug 24. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/20d3595f-212a-4342-84d9-bfdb0228f535/content
  11. World Health Organization. Smallpox and mpox (orthopoxviruses): WHO position paper, August 2024. Journal article. Wkly Epidemiol Rec [Internet]. 2024 Aug 23; cited 2026 Aug 24;99(34):429–456. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer-9934-429-456
  12. Pischel L, Martini BA, Yu N, Cacesse D, Tracy M, Kharbanda K, Ahmed N, Patel KM, Grimshaw AA, Malik AA, Goshua G, Omer SB. Vaccine effectiveness of 3rd generation mpox vaccines against mpox and disease severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal article. Vaccine [Internet]. 2024 Nov 14; cited 2026 Aug 24;42(25):126053. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24006947?via%3Dihub doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.021
  13. Okumura N, Morino E, Nomoto H, Yanagi M, Takahashi K, Iwasaki H, Uemura Y, Shimizu Y, Mizushima D, Fukushima K, Kinai E, Shiojiri D, Itoda I, Onoe Y, Kobori Y, Nakamura F, Tokita D, Sugiura W, Ueno S, Ainai A, Mine S, Suzuki T, Ohmagari N, Ujiie M. LC16m8 for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Against Mpox in a High-Risk Population: An Open-Label Randomized Trial. Journal article. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2025 Feb 21; cited 2026 Aug 24;82(4):665–72. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/82/4/665/8029797 doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf074
  14. Grabenstein JD, Hacker A. Vaccines against mpox: MVA-BN and LC16m8. Journal article. Expert Rev Vaccines [Internet]. 2024 Dec 31; cited 2026 Aug 24;23(1):796–811. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2024.2397006 doi:10.1080/14760584.2024.2397006
  15. Kazadi DM, Lewis RF, Akilimali P, Kalala D, Van Kerkhove M, Ihekweazu C. The mpox epidemic is not over: Reducing disproportionate burden in Africa and persistent global risk require a sustained response. Journal article. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2026 Feb 3; cited 2026 Aug 24;23(2):e1004893. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004893 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004893
  16. Otieno JR, Ruis C, Onoja AB, Kuppalli K, Hoxha A, Nitsche A, Brinkmann A, Michel J, Mbala-Kingebeni P, Mukadi-Bamuleka D, Osman MM, Hussein H, Raja MA, Fotsing R, Herring BL, Keita M, Rico JM, Gresh L, Barakat A, Katawera V, Nahapetyan K, Naidoo D, Floto RA, Cunningham J, Van Kerkhove MD, Lewis RF, Subissi L. Global genomic surveillance of monkeypox virus. Journal article. Nat Med [Internet]. 2024 Oct 23; cited 2026 Aug 24;31(1):342–50. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03370-3 doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03370-3
Views: 528